Malta vs Paraguay: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Malta
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 188.75 kg/ha against 181.31 kg/ha in Malta, a difference of 7.44 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 33rd and Paraguay ranks 30th of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 102.85 kg/ha | 27.09 kg/ha | 75.76 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1970s | 137.78 kg/ha | 44.7 kg/ha | 93.08 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1980s | 185.28 kg/ha | 69.84 kg/ha | 115.44 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1990s | 247.32 kg/ha | 86.86 kg/ha | 160.47 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 276.97 kg/ha | 120.77 kg/ha | 156.2 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 196.82 kg/ha | 186.16 kg/ha | 10.67 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 184.01 kg/ha | 183.36 kg/ha | 0.6458 kg/ha | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Malta or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 188.75 kg/ha against 181.31 kg/ha in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Malta and Paraguay?
- 7.44 kg/ha, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Paraguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Paraguay rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Malta ranks 33rd and Paraguay ranks 30th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).