Mauritania vs Russian Federation: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Mauritania
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 43.1 kg/ha against 41.27 kg/ha in Mauritania, a difference of 1.83 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Mauritania ranks 145th and Russian Federation ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Russian Federation in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30.54 kg/ha | 35.14 kg/ha | 4.6 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 31.61 kg/ha | 26.28 kg/ha | 5.33 kg/ha | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 38.23 kg/ha | 32.11 kg/ha | 6.12 kg/ha | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 42.15 kg/ha | 42.29 kg/ha | 0.1318 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Mauritania or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 43.1 kg/ha against 41.27 kg/ha in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Mauritania and Russian Federation?
- 1.83 kg/ha, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Russian Federation rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Mauritania ranks 145th and Russian Federation ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).