Panama vs Sri Lanka: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Panama
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 90.07 kg/ha against 89.01 kg/ha in Panama, a difference of 1.06 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Panama ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 37.72 kg/ha | 43.45 kg/ha | 5.73 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 44.38 kg/ha | 51.86 kg/ha | 7.48 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 48.42 kg/ha | 75.27 kg/ha | 26.85 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 57.07 kg/ha | 87.42 kg/ha | 30.35 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 51.65 kg/ha | 104.38 kg/ha | 52.74 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 61.74 kg/ha | 91.51 kg/ha | 29.77 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 91.74 kg/ha | 87.27 kg/ha | 4.48 kg/ha | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Panama or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 90.07 kg/ha against 89.01 kg/ha in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Panama and Sri Lanka?
- 1.06 kg/ha, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Sri Lanka rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Panama ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).