Russian Federation vs Togo: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Russian Federation
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 44.98 kg/ha against 43.1 kg/ha in Russian Federation, a difference of 1.88 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 143rd and Togo ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35.14 kg/ha | 17.32 kg/ha | 17.82 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 26.28 kg/ha | 17.17 kg/ha | 9.11 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 32.11 kg/ha | 25.71 kg/ha | 6.4 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 42.29 kg/ha | 37.68 kg/ha | 4.6 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Russian Federation or Togo?
- Togo, at 44.98 kg/ha against 43.1 kg/ha in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Russian Federation and Togo?
- 1.88 kg/ha, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Togo?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and Togo rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Russian Federation ranks 143rd and Togo ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).