South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- South Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 40.56 kg/ha against 38.63 kg/ha in South Sudan, a difference of 1.93 kg/ha.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 32.31 kg/ha | 28.31 kg/ha | 4 kg/ha | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 38.94 kg/ha | 39.78 kg/ha | 0.8404 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 40.56 kg/ha against 38.63 kg/ha in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 1.93 kg/ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- South Sudan ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).