Southern Africa vs Uzbekistan: Input β Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input β Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Southern Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 275.13 kg/ha against 65.39 kg/ha in Southern Africa, a difference of 209.74 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 4.2 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Southern Africa ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 38 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34.75 kg/ha | 157.08 kg/ha | 122.34 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 38.45 kg/ha | 154.98 kg/ha | 116.53 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 49.17 kg/ha | 215.84 kg/ha | 166.67 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 65.36 kg/ha | 264.89 kg/ha | 199.53 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input β cropland nitrogen per unit area, Southern Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 275.13 kg/ha against 65.39 kg/ha in Southern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input β cropland nitrogen per unit area between Southern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 209.74 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Southern Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for input β cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Southern Africa ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 38 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input β Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).