Suriname vs Uzbekistan: Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Suriname
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 275.13 kg/ha against 248.08 kg/ha in Suriname, a difference of 27.05 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Suriname ranks 20th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 121.06 kg/ha | 157.08 kg/ha | 36.02 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 168 kg/ha | 154.98 kg/ha | 13.02 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 180.08 kg/ha | 215.84 kg/ha | 35.75 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 202.86 kg/ha | 264.89 kg/ha | 62.03 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Suriname or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 275.13 kg/ha against 248.08 kg/ha in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Suriname and Uzbekistan?
- 27.05 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Suriname and Uzbekistan rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Suriname ranks 20th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).