Afghanistan vs Senegal: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Afghanistan
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 189,538 t against 169,632 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 19,906 t.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Senegal ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 94th and Senegal ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 5 and Senegal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 109,639 t | 114,835 t | 5,195 t | Senegal |
| 1970s | 141,487 t | 122,508 t | 18,979 t | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | 149,414 t | 105,376 t | 44,038 t | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 116,230 t | 104,790 t | 11,440 t | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 112,853 t | 109,857 t | 2,995 t | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 191,733 t | 161,987 t | 29,745 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 168,721 t | 211,511 t | 42,790 t | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Afghanistan or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 189,538 t against 169,632 t in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Afghanistan and Senegal?
- 19,906 t, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Senegal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Senegal rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Afghanistan ranks 94th and Senegal ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).