Azerbaijan vs Kyrgyzstan: Input — Cropland nitrogen

Azerbaijan
101,647 t
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan
99,264 t
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
114th
Kyrgyzstan rank
116th

Input — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Kyrgyzstan
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k199220072023

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 101,647 t against 99,264 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2,383 t.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 114th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 116th of 201 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 51,422 t 65,510 t 14,088 t Kyrgyzstan
2000s 46,485 t 57,564 t 11,079 t Kyrgyzstan
2010s 80,666 t 86,534 t 5,868 t Kyrgyzstan
2020s 100,471 t 102,033 t 1,563 t Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Azerbaijan or Kyrgyzstan?
Azerbaijan, at 101,647 t against 99,264 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan?
2,383 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
Azerbaijan ranks 114th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 116th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).