Belarus vs Colombia: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Colombia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 808,158 t against 775,514 t in Belarus, a difference of 32,644 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 35th and Colombia ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Colombia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 579,684 t | 574,060 t | 5,624 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 650,857 t | 696,026 t | 45,169 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 755,624 t | 787,902 t | 32,278 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 745,254 t | 808,517 t | 63,262 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Colombia?
- Colombia, at 808,158 t against 775,514 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Colombia?
- 32,644 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Colombia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Colombia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 35th and Colombia ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).