Belarus vs Romania: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 798,498 t against 775,514 t in Belarus, a difference of 22,984 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Romania ahead.
Belarus ranks 35th and Romania ranks 34th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 579,684 t | 684,366 t | 104,683 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 650,857 t | 599,658 t | 51,199 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 755,624 t | 764,042 t | 8,418 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 745,254 t | 859,330 t | 114,076 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Romania?
- Romania, at 798,498 t against 775,514 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Romania?
- 22,984 t, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Romania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Romania rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 35th and Romania ranks 34th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).