Belgium vs Guatemala: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belgium
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 288,238 t against 283,460 t in Belgium, a difference of 4,778 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 67th and Guatemala ranks 65th of 201 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 322,061 t | 208,432 t | 113,629 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 334,708 t | 287,723 t | 46,986 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 305,186 t | 304,346 t | 839.75 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Belgium or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 288,238 t against 283,460 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Belgium and Guatemala?
- 4,778 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Guatemala?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Guatemala rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Belgium ranks 67th and Guatemala ranks 65th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).