Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Israel: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Israel
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 56,603 t against 48,259 t in Israel, a difference of 8,344 t.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Israel ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 115th and Israel ranks 116th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Israel in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 46,979 t | 63,269 t | 16,290 t | Israel |
| 2000s | 67,725 t | 60,834 t | 6,891 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 99,380 t | 60,690 t | 38,690 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 71,273 t | 50,909 t | 20,364 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Israel?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 56,603 t against 48,259 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Israel?
- 8,344 t, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Israel?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Israel rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 115th and Israel ranks 116th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).