Burkina Faso vs Sweden: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burkina Faso
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 263,145 t against 245,815 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 17,330 t.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 72nd and Sweden ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 32,153 t | 290,892 t | 258,739 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 38,165 t | 370,820 t | 332,655 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 52,050 t | 364,218 t | 312,168 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 84,230 t | 313,265 t | 229,035 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 129,330 t | 272,362 t | 143,031 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 190,722 t | 273,066 t | 82,343 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 224,501 t | 267,647 t | 43,146 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Burkina Faso or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 263,145 t against 245,815 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Burkina Faso and Sweden?
- 17,330 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Sweden rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Burkina Faso ranks 72nd and Sweden ranks 70th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).