Burundi vs El Salvador: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burundi
- El Salvador
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 98,948 t against 81,860 t in El Salvador, a difference of 17,088 t.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.
Burundi ranks 117th and El Salvador ranks 119th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 21,028 t | 43,904 t | 22,876 t | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 25,417 t | 87,832 t | 62,415 t | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 28,631 t | 77,173 t | 48,542 t | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 31,088 t | 80,123 t | 49,035 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 28,335 t | 79,414 t | 51,078 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 46,862 t | 86,318 t | 39,455 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 94,486 t | 83,887 t | 10,600 t | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Burundi or El Salvador?
- Burundi, at 98,948 t against 81,860 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Burundi and El Salvador?
- 17,088 t, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and El Salvador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and El Salvador rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Burundi ranks 117th and El Salvador ranks 119th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).