Cambodia vs Serbia: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cambodia
- Serbia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 361,678 t against 322,897 t in Serbia, a difference of 38,781 t.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 57th and Serbia ranks 59th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 198,503 t | 332,006 t | 133,504 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 262,924 t | 319,821 t | 56,897 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 333,108 t | 330,780 t | 2,328 t | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Cambodia or Serbia?
- Cambodia, at 361,678 t against 322,897 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Cambodia and Serbia?
- 38,781 t, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Serbia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Cambodia ranks 57th and Serbia ranks 59th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).