Central African Republic vs Cuba: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central African Republic
- Cuba
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 81,127 t against 76,383 t in Cuba, a difference of 4,744 t.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 108th and Cuba ranks 110th of 186 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,608 t | 191,637 t | 167,029 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 33,435 t | 266,626 t | 233,191 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 38,633 t | 401,475 t | 362,841 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 40,688 t | 245,431 t | 204,743 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 47,868 t | 136,035 t | 88,167 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 60,397 t | 140,136 t | 79,740 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 82,572 t | 87,216 t | 4,644 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Central African Republic or Cuba?
- Central African Republic, at 81,127 t against 76,383 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Central African Republic and Cuba?
- 4,744 t, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Cuba rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Central African Republic ranks 108th and Cuba ranks 110th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).