Chile vs Ethiopia PDR: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Chile
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 283,948 t against 265,395 t in Chile, a difference of 18,553 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 62nd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 60th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 67,442 t | 188,020 t | 120,579 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 89,448 t | 222,877 t | 133,430 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 134,061 t | 245,993 t | 111,932 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 193,605 t | 277,896 t | 84,292 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Chile or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 283,948 t against 265,395 t in Chile as of 1992.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Chile and Ethiopia PDR?
- 18,553 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Chile and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Chile ranks 62nd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 60th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).