Colombia vs Côte d'Ivoire: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Colombia
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 808,158 t against 237,608 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 570,550 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 3.4 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 31st and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th of 186 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 193,703 t | 29,995 t | 163,708 t | Colombia |
| 1970s | 295,914 t | 48,841 t | 247,073 t | Colombia |
| 1980s | 418,047 t | 64,802 t | 353,245 t | Colombia |
| 1990s | 578,135 t | 104,836 t | 473,299 t | Colombia |
| 2000s | 696,026 t | 107,528 t | 588,498 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 787,902 t | 152,571 t | 635,330 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 808,517 t | 204,795 t | 603,722 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Colombia or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Colombia, at 808,158 t against 237,608 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Colombia and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 570,550 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Colombia ranks 31st and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).