Croatia vs Honduras: Input — Cropland nitrogen

Croatia
150,802 t
in 2023
Honduras
157,951 t
in 2023
Croatia rank
100th
Honduras rank
99th

Input — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Croatia
  • Honduras
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 157,951 t against 150,802 t in Croatia, a difference of 7,149 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 100th and Honduras ranks 99th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Honduras in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Honduras Difference Ahead
1990s 160,954 t 94,222 t 66,732 t Croatia
2000s 182,982 t 106,382 t 76,600 t Croatia
2010s 156,171 t 132,334 t 23,837 t Croatia
2020s 151,336 t 165,260 t 13,924 t Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Croatia or Honduras?
Honduras, at 157,951 t against 150,802 t in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Croatia and Honduras?
7,149 t, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Honduras?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Honduras rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
Croatia ranks 100th and Honduras ranks 99th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).