Croatia vs Madagascar: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Croatia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 150,802 t against 146,693 t in Madagascar, a difference of 4,109 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 100th and Madagascar ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 160,954 t | 96,368 t | 64,587 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 182,982 t | 93,302 t | 89,680 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 156,171 t | 117,742 t | 38,428 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 151,336 t | 135,448 t | 15,888 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Croatia or Madagascar?
- Croatia, at 150,802 t against 146,693 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Croatia and Madagascar?
- 4,109 t, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Madagascar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Madagascar rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Croatia ranks 100th and Madagascar ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).