Croatia vs Zimbabwe: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Croatia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 164,955 t against 150,802 t in Croatia, a difference of 14,153 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 90th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 160,954 t | 133,002 t | 27,952 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 182,982 t | 104,748 t | 78,234 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 156,171 t | 115,820 t | 40,351 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 151,336 t | 161,962 t | 10,626 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Croatia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 164,955 t against 150,802 t in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Croatia and Zimbabwe?
- 14,153 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Zimbabwe rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Croatia ranks 90th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).