Cuba vs Estonia: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- Estonia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 76,383 t against 66,477 t in Estonia, a difference of 9,906 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 121st and Estonia ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 216,151 t | 48,003 t | 168,149 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 136,035 t | 39,332 t | 96,704 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 140,136 t | 58,123 t | 82,013 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 87,216 t | 69,860 t | 17,356 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Estonia?
- Cuba, at 76,383 t against 66,477 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Estonia?
- 9,906 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Estonia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 121st and Estonia ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).