Czechia vs Hungary: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechia
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 378,190 t against 374,389 t in Czechia, a difference of 3,801 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 54th and Hungary ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 403,391 t | 443,472 t | 40,080 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 395,672 t | 463,250 t | 67,578 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 457,184 t | 493,979 t | 36,795 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 397,940 t | 507,008 t | 109,068 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 378,190 t against 374,389 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and Hungary?
- 3,801 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Hungary?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Hungary rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechia ranks 54th and Hungary ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).