Czechia vs Uruguay: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 374,389 t against 374,124 t in Uruguay, a difference of 265 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 54th and Uruguay ranks 55th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 403,391 t | 86,125 t | 317,266 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 395,672 t | 145,663 t | 250,009 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 457,184 t | 365,045 t | 92,138 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 397,940 t | 408,212 t | 10,272 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or Uruguay?
- Czechia, at 374,389 t against 374,124 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and Uruguay?
- 265 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Uruguay?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Uruguay rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechia ranks 54th and Uruguay ranks 55th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).