Dominica vs French Polynesia: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominica
- French Polynesia
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 653.16 t against 579.3 t in Dominica, a difference of 73.86 t.
That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Dominica's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 188th and French Polynesia ranks 187th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 6 and French Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,864 t | 230.49 t | 1,633 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 1,813 t | 379.78 t | 1,434 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 1,484 t | 721.48 t | 762.9 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 2,039 t | 801.96 t | 1,237 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 964.01 t | 777.7 t | 186.31 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 735.57 t | 730.18 t | 5.39 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 638.04 t | 749.41 t | 111.36 t | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Dominica or French Polynesia?
- French Polynesia, at 653.16 t against 579.3 t in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Dominica and French Polynesia?
- 73.86 t, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and French Polynesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and French Polynesia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Dominica ranks 188th and French Polynesia ranks 187th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).