Dominica vs Grenada: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominica
- Grenada
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 579.3 t against 487.78 t in Grenada, a difference of 91.52 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.2 times Grenada's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 188th and Grenada ranks 189th of 201 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,864 t | 634.19 t | 1,230 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 1,813 t | 679.42 t | 1,134 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 1,484 t | 601.53 t | 882.85 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 2,039 t | 601.7 t | 1,437 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 964.01 t | 479.64 t | 484.38 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 735.57 t | 496.62 t | 238.95 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 638.04 t | 503.47 t | 134.57 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Dominica or Grenada?
- Dominica, at 579.3 t against 487.78 t in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Dominica and Grenada?
- 91.52 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Grenada?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Grenada rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Dominica ranks 188th and Grenada ranks 189th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).