Dominica vs Saint Lucia: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominica
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 671.33 t against 579.3 t in Dominica, a difference of 92.03 t.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.2 times Dominica's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 188th and Saint Lucia ranks 186th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 5 and Saint Lucia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,864 t | 798.68 t | 1,065 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 1,813 t | 1,738 t | 75.25 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 1,484 t | 1,876 t | 391.66 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 2,039 t | 1,690 t | 348.77 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 964.01 t | 714.44 t | 249.57 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 735.57 t | 656.71 t | 78.86 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 638.04 t | 670.22 t | 32.18 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Dominica or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 671.33 t against 579.3 t in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Dominica and Saint Lucia?
- 92.03 t, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Saint Lucia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Saint Lucia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Dominica ranks 188th and Saint Lucia ranks 186th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).