Dominican Republic vs Zimbabwe: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominican Republic
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 165,460 t against 164,955 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 505 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 46,761 t | 58,972 t | 12,211 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 73,356 t | 101,374 t | 28,018 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 72,652 t | 127,975 t | 55,324 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 97,972 t | 134,909 t | 36,937 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 118,395 t | 104,748 t | 13,647 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 147,751 t | 115,820 t | 31,932 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 182,499 t | 161,962 t | 20,536 t | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Dominican Republic or Zimbabwe?
- Dominican Republic, at 165,460 t against 164,955 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 505 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Dominican Republic ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).