Ecuador vs Sweden: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ecuador
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 263,145 t against 260,787 t in Ecuador, a difference of 2,358 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Ecuador ranks 71st and Sweden ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 71,945 t | 290,892 t | 218,947 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 108,604 t | 370,820 t | 262,216 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 134,001 t | 364,218 t | 230,217 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 177,459 t | 313,265 t | 135,806 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 246,874 t | 272,362 t | 25,488 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 308,731 t | 273,066 t | 35,666 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 303,560 t | 267,647 t | 35,914 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Ecuador or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 263,145 t against 260,787 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Ecuador and Sweden?
- 2,358 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Sweden rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Ecuador ranks 71st and Sweden ranks 70th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).