Egypt vs Ethiopia: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Egypt
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 1.37 million t against 1.13 million t in Ethiopia, a difference of 241,490 t.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 26th and Ethiopia ranks 29th of 201 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.03 million t | 296,367 t | 735,955 t | Egypt |
| 2000s | 1.31 million t | 412,701 t | 897,444 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 1.32 million t | 767,605 t | 554,631 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 1.43 million t | 1.03 million t | 400,938 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Egypt or Ethiopia?
- Egypt, at 1.37 million t against 1.13 million t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Egypt and Ethiopia?
- 241,490 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Ethiopia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Egypt ranks 26th and Ethiopia ranks 29th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).