El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- El Salvador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 99,264 t against 81,860 t in El Salvador, a difference of 17,404 t.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
El Salvador ranks 119th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 116th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 80,621 t | 65,510 t | 15,111 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 79,414 t | 57,564 t | 21,849 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 86,318 t | 86,534 t | 216.43 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 83,887 t | 102,033 t | 18,147 t | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, El Salvador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 99,264 t against 81,860 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 17,404 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- El Salvador ranks 119th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 116th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).