El Salvador vs Rwanda: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- El Salvador
- Rwanda
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 81,860 t against 78,047 t in Rwanda, a difference of 3,813 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 119th and Rwanda ranks 120th of 201 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 43,904 t | 14,044 t | 29,860 t | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 87,832 t | 20,161 t | 67,671 t | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 77,173 t | 26,340 t | 50,833 t | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 80,123 t | 22,229 t | 57,895 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 79,414 t | 38,906 t | 40,508 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 86,318 t | 66,303 t | 20,014 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 83,887 t | 79,629 t | 4,257 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, El Salvador or Rwanda?
- El Salvador, at 81,860 t against 78,047 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between El Salvador and Rwanda?
- 3,813 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Rwanda rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- El Salvador ranks 119th and Rwanda ranks 120th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).