Eritrea vs Gabon: Input — Cropland nitrogen

Eritrea
13,986 t
in 2023
Gabon
14,705 t
in 2023
Eritrea rank
151st
Gabon rank
149th

Input — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Eritrea
  • Gabon
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 14,705 t against 13,986 t in Eritrea, a difference of 719 t.

That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 151st and Gabon ranks 149th of 201 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Gabon Difference Ahead
1990s 12,787 t 6,494 t 6,293 t Eritrea
2000s 13,119 t 7,960 t 5,159 t Eritrea
2010s 14,136 t 11,905 t 2,230 t Eritrea
2020s 15,065 t 13,682 t 1,382 t Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Eritrea or Gabon?
Gabon, at 14,705 t against 13,986 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Eritrea and Gabon?
719 t, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Gabon?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Gabon rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
Eritrea ranks 151st and Gabon ranks 149th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).