Eritrea vs United Arab Emirates: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eritrea
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 15,093 t against 13,986 t in Eritrea, a difference of 1,107 t.
That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Eritrea ranks 151st and United Arab Emirates ranks 148th of 201 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,787 t | 25,434 t | 12,647 t | United Arab Emirates |
| 2000s | 13,119 t | 31,924 t | 18,804 t | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 14,136 t | 18,926 t | 4,790 t | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 15,065 t | 15,163 t | 98.67 t | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Eritrea or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 15,093 t against 13,986 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Eritrea and United Arab Emirates?
- 1,107 t, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and United Arab Emirates?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and United Arab Emirates rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Eritrea ranks 151st and United Arab Emirates ranks 148th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).