Estonia vs Melanesia: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- Melanesia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 66,477 t against 56,871 t in Melanesia, a difference of 9,606 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times Melanesia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 122nd and Melanesia ranks 125th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Melanesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48,003 t | 36,952 t | 11,051 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 39,332 t | 40,370 t | 1,038 t | Melanesia |
| 2010s | 58,123 t | 50,635 t | 7,488 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 69,860 t | 57,409 t | 12,452 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or Melanesia?
- Estonia, at 66,477 t against 56,871 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and Melanesia?
- 9,606 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Melanesia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Melanesia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 122nd and Melanesia ranks 125th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).