Estonia vs Rwanda: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 78,047 t against 66,477 t in Estonia, a difference of 11,570 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 111th and Rwanda ranks 109th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48,003 t | 21,205 t | 26,797 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 39,332 t | 38,906 t | 425.95 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 58,123 t | 66,303 t | 8,180 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 69,860 t | 79,629 t | 9,769 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 78,047 t against 66,477 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and Rwanda?
- 11,570 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Rwanda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Rwanda rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 111th and Rwanda ranks 109th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).