Eswatini vs Jamaica: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eswatini
- Jamaica
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 12,725 t against 11,924 t in Jamaica, a difference of 801 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.
Eswatini ranks 155th and Jamaica ranks 157th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,358 t | 15,495 t | 10,137 t | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 7,975 t | 17,566 t | 9,591 t | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 10,920 t | 19,080 t | 8,160 t | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 8,523 t | 17,256 t | 8,733 t | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 9,540 t | 16,576 t | 7,036 t | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 10,988 t | 13,668 t | 2,680 t | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 13,061 t | 12,516 t | 544.58 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Eswatini or Jamaica?
- Eswatini, at 12,725 t against 11,924 t in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Eswatini and Jamaica?
- 801 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jamaica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Jamaica rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Eswatini ranks 155th and Jamaica ranks 157th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).