Ethiopia vs Philippines: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia
- Philippines
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 1.13 million t against 1.03 million t in Philippines, a difference of 100,710 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Philippines ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 29th and Philippines ranks 30th of 201 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 296,367 t | 717,780 t | 421,414 t | Philippines |
| 2000s | 412,701 t | 810,095 t | 397,394 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 767,605 t | 933,963 t | 166,358 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 1.03 million t | 1.04 million t | 1,523 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia or Philippines?
- Ethiopia, at 1.13 million t against 1.03 million t in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia and Philippines?
- 100,710 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Philippines?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Philippines rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia ranks 29th and Philippines ranks 30th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).