France vs Viet Nam: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- France
- Viet Nam
How they compare
France currently reports 2.62 million t against 2.45 million t in Viet Nam, a difference of 175,740 t.
That makes France's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.
France ranks 12th and Viet Nam ranks 15th of 201 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.89 million t | 329,904 t | 1.56 million t | France |
| 1970s | 2.74 million t | 456,373 t | 2.28 million t | France |
| 1980s | 3.43 million t | 661,379 t | 2.77 million t | France |
| 1990s | 3.49 million t | 1.29 million t | 2.19 million t | France |
| 2000s | 3.22 million t | 1.82 million t | 1.40 million t | France |
| 2010s | 3.05 million t | 2.17 million t | 883,074 t | France |
| 2020s | 2.70 million t | 2.28 million t | 420,272 t | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, France or Viet Nam?
- France, at 2.62 million t against 2.45 million t in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between France and Viet Nam?
- 175,740 t, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do France and Viet Nam rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- France ranks 12th and Viet Nam ranks 15th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).