Georgia vs Haiti: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Georgia
- Haiti
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 45,494 t against 45,308 t in Haiti, a difference of 186 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 129th and Haiti ranks 130th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Haiti in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 53,048 t | 36,428 t | 16,621 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 41,384 t | 48,155 t | 6,771 t | Haiti |
| 2010s | 30,887 t | 63,777 t | 32,890 t | Haiti |
| 2020s | 46,641 t | 47,511 t | 869.82 t | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Georgia or Haiti?
- Georgia, at 45,494 t against 45,308 t in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Georgia and Haiti?
- 186 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Haiti?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Haiti rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Georgia ranks 129th and Haiti ranks 130th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).