Israel vs Sierra Leone: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Israel
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 57,650 t against 48,259 t in Israel, a difference of 9,391 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 116th and Sierra Leone ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 6 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28,502 t | 14,865 t | 13,637 t | Israel |
| 1970s | 41,541 t | 17,846 t | 23,696 t | Israel |
| 1980s | 57,153 t | 19,325 t | 37,829 t | Israel |
| 1990s | 61,429 t | 20,879 t | 40,550 t | Israel |
| 2000s | 60,834 t | 35,956 t | 24,878 t | Israel |
| 2010s | 60,690 t | 48,012 t | 12,678 t | Israel |
| 2020s | 50,909 t | 54,535 t | 3,625 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Israel or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 57,650 t against 48,259 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Israel and Sierra Leone?
- 9,391 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Sierra Leone rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Israel ranks 116th and Sierra Leone ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).