Japan vs Sudan (former): Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Japan
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Japan currently reports 476,929 t against 459,761 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 17,168 t.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 43rd and Sudan (former) ranks 45th of 201 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 835,747 t | 133,449 t | 702,298 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 835,925 t | 210,942 t | 624,983 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 813,492 t | 239,347 t | 574,145 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 701,814 t | 281,789 t | 420,024 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 616,282 t | 369,972 t | 246,310 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 563,674 t | 464,086 t | 99,588 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Japan or Sudan (former)?
- Japan, at 476,929 t against 459,761 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Japan and Sudan (former)?
- 17,168 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Japan and Sudan (former) rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Japan ranks 43rd and Sudan (former) ranks 45th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).