Jordan vs Libya: Input — Cropland nitrogen

Jordan
30,583 t
in 2023
Libya
36,147 t
in 2023
Jordan rank
135th
Libya rank
133rd

Input — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Jordan
  • Libya
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 36,147 t against 30,583 t in Jordan, a difference of 5,564 t.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Jordan's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 135th and Libya ranks 133rd of 201 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 5,360 t 9,179 t 3,819 t Libya
1970s 6,707 t 20,618 t 13,911 t Libya
1980s 11,978 t 43,337 t 31,359 t Libya
1990s 13,605 t 44,268 t 30,663 t Libya
2000s 13,317 t 47,675 t 34,359 t Libya
2010s 20,822 t 40,438 t 19,616 t Libya
2020s 24,460 t 32,603 t 8,143 t Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Jordan or Libya?
Libya, at 36,147 t against 30,583 t in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Jordan and Libya?
5,564 t, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Libya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Libya rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
Jordan ranks 135th and Libya ranks 133rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).