Jordan vs New Zealand: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Jordan
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 39,447 t against 30,583 t in Jordan, a difference of 8,864 t.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.
Jordan ranks 135th and New Zealand ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,360 t | 6,913 t | 1,553 t | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 6,707 t | 9,991 t | 3,284 t | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 11,978 t | 11,893 t | 85.2 t | Jordan |
| 1990s | 13,605 t | 18,999 t | 5,394 t | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 13,317 t | 33,505 t | 20,188 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 20,822 t | 42,602 t | 21,779 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 24,460 t | 42,358 t | 17,898 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Jordan or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 39,447 t against 30,583 t in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Jordan and New Zealand?
- 8,864 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and New Zealand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and New Zealand rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Jordan ranks 135th and New Zealand ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).