Kazakhstan vs Kenya: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 423,043 t against 379,810 t in Kenya, a difference of 43,233 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 48th and Kenya ranks 51st of 201 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 444,956 t | 168,468 t | 276,488 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 318,387 t | 202,642 t | 115,745 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 414,907 t | 304,788 t | 110,119 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 413,754 t | 359,960 t | 53,794 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Kazakhstan or Kenya?
- Kazakhstan, at 423,043 t against 379,810 t in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Kazakhstan and Kenya?
- 43,233 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kenya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kenya rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Kazakhstan ranks 48th and Kenya ranks 51st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).