Kiribati vs Maldives: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kiribati
- Maldives
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 405.22 t against 337.52 t in Maldives, a difference of 67.7 t.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 191st and Maldives ranks 194th of 201 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 180.45 t | 33.27 t | 147.17 t | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 194.31 t | 48.93 t | 145.38 t | Kiribati |
| 1980s | 219.87 t | 78.17 t | 141.7 t | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 249.01 t | 112 t | 137.02 t | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 336.28 t | 211.51 t | 124.77 t | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 389.3 t | 361.53 t | 27.77 t | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 403.11 t | 329.29 t | 73.82 t | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Kiribati or Maldives?
- Kiribati, at 405.22 t against 337.52 t in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Kiribati and Maldives?
- 67.7 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Maldives?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Maldives rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Kiribati ranks 191st and Maldives ranks 194th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).