Latvia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Latvia
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 113,751 t against 108,526 t in Latvia, a difference of 5,225 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Latvia ranks 113th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 70,749 t | 279,320 t | 208,570 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2000s | 62,604 t | 294,667 t | 232,063 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 95,578 t | 120,987 t | 25,409 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2020s | 118,840 t | 93,832 t | 25,008 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Latvia or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 113,751 t against 108,526 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Latvia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 5,225 t, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Latvia ranks 113th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).