Latvia vs Tunisia: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Latvia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 110,430 t against 108,526 t in Latvia, a difference of 1,904 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 113th and Tunisia ranks 112th of 201 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 70,749 t | 94,589 t | 23,840 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 62,604 t | 114,796 t | 52,192 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 95,578 t | 132,824 t | 37,246 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 118,840 t | 126,174 t | 7,334 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Latvia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 110,430 t against 108,526 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Latvia and Tunisia?
- 1,904 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Tunisia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Latvia ranks 113th and Tunisia ranks 112th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).