Lithuania vs Mali: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Lithuania
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 241,120 t against 237,333 t in Lithuania, a difference of 3,787 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 78th and Mali ranks 75th of 201 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 168,160 t | 73,742 t | 94,418 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 184,198 t | 131,619 t | 52,579 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 236,436 t | 227,431 t | 9,006 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 248,420 t | 237,911 t | 10,509 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Lithuania or Mali?
- Mali, at 241,120 t against 237,333 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Lithuania and Mali?
- 3,787 t, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mali?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Mali rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Lithuania ranks 78th and Mali ranks 75th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).